🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 776+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

1960s Kodak Instamatic 104 Camera

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.2 out of 5 (776 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$30
$50
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

4 inches, a few wear on the front. DOES NOT WORK.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy fulfillment

↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

1960s Kodak Instamatic 104 Camera

4 inches, various wear on the front. DOES NOT WORK.

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 308443

Category: Vintage > Electronics > Cameras

Original Price: $50 USD

Sale Price:$30 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7303 reviews
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
I tried the 1960s Kodak Instamatic 104 Camera and it works as described.
26 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Louisville, KY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
adore it!
From my experience, the 1960s Kodak Instamatic 104 Camera feels okay which is good enough. No setup issues.
44 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
cherish it!
The 1960s Kodak Instamatic 104 Camera quality matches its price.
3 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 days ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five stars!
The 1960s Kodak Instamatic 104 Camera quality is nothing unexpected.
43 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
adore love love!
So far, it is basic to use so it’s acceptable.
50 people found this helpful