๐Ÿšš no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.5/5 from 176+ reviews
Vintage โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

RUBY CASH LLAMA COSMETIC BAG

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.5 out of 5 (176 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$13.3
$22.17
Sale
โœ“ on the house dispatch on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Brand recent with tags, in sought-after pink

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
swift dispatch

โ†ฉ๏ธ
practical Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

RUBY CASH LLAMA COSMETIC BAG

Brand fresh with tags, in sought-after pink

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 355837

Category: Vintage > Bags & Purses > Pouches

Original Price: $22.17 USD

Sale Price:$13.3 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

๐Ÿšš fulfillment & Returns

โœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.5
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 9559 reviews
DC​
Daniel Clark โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท newly-released York, NY
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
exceptional for my needs
Works perfectly. Good RUBY CASH LLAMA COSMETIC BAG.​
39 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Sacramento, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Outstanding!
The RUBY CASH LLAMA COSMETIC BAG arrived quickly and cleanly.
48 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Colorado Springs, CO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
cherish it!
After several use, the RUBY CASH LLAMA COSMETIC BAG feels solid which is good enough.
5 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Dallas, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Absolutely exceptional
Everything works as described. The RUBY CASH LLAMA COSMETIC BAG is fine.
20 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Colorado Springs, CO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
So glad I bought this
From my experience, the RUBY CASH LLAMA COSMETIC BAG performs as expected which is good enough.
38 people found this helpful