๐Ÿšš no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.9/5 from 530+ reviews
Other โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Cleveland alto sax 1960-70

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.9 out of 5 (530 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$200
$333.33
Sale
โœ“ on the house dispatch on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Used band instrument scratches and scuffs from normal 60 years of use. Needs pad job

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
express fulfillment
โ†ฉ๏ธ
straightforward Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Cleveland alto sax 1960-70

Used band instrument scratches and scuffs from normal 60 years of use. Needs pad job

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Other products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 508992

Category: Other > Musical Instruments > Band & Orchestra

Original Price: $333.33 USD

Sale Price:$200 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

๐Ÿšš dispatch & Returns

โœ“ on the house delivery on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days​

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.9
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 4444 reviews
RM
Robert Martinez โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท Sacramento, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Outstanding quality
The Cleveland alto sax 1960-70 is better than expected.
4 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Albuquerque, NM
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
splendid for my needs
The Cleveland alto sax 1960-70 feels normal quality.
41 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Virginia Beach, VA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
terrific find!
The Cleveland alto sax 1960-70 design and color match the photos perfectly.
14 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago ยท Los Angeles, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
impeccable purchase
Good experience with this Cleveland alto sax 1960-70.
19 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez
1 week ago ยท Cincinnati, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
No complaints
The Cleveland alto sax 1960-70 feels okay, not budget-friendly.
17 people found this helpful