🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 395+ reviews
Women βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Material Girl Pink Floral Jelly Sandals

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.4 out of 5 (395 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$28
$46.67
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vibrant Pink jelly sandals with large floral design. impeccable for adding flair to any outfit.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy fulfillment

↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Material Girl Pink Floral Jelly Sandals

Vibrant Pink jelly sandals with large floral design. outstanding for adding flair to any outfit.

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 565783

Category: Women > Shoes > Sandals

Original Price: $46.67 USD

Sale Price:$28 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.4
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5835 reviews
BT​
Brittany Turner βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
A must-have
From my experience, the Material Girl Pink Floral Jelly Sandals works fine which is good enough.​
27 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly urge!
Honestly, the Material Girl Pink Floral Jelly Sandals feels okay and it works for me.
16 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis
3 weeks ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Really fabulous
No complaints here.
38 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding quality
No issues until at this moment.
40 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Oakland, CA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Fantastic product
At first, the Material Girl Pink Floral Jelly Sandals works well enough and I don’t regret it.
50 people found this helpful