๐Ÿšš no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.9/5 from 904+ reviews
Women โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Vintage Style traditional Style Round Quartz Pocket Watch Women's Watches

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.9 out of 5 (904 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$31.8
$53
Sale
โœ“ no-cost shipment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

None

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
swift dispatch
โ†ฉ๏ธ
practical Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Style enduring Style Round Quartz Pocket Watch Women's Watches

None​

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Women products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 936202

Category: Women > Jewelry >

Original Price: $53 USD

Sale Price: $31.8 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

๐Ÿšš fulfillment & Returns

โœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.9
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 1794 reviews
MR
Mike Reynolds โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago ยท Houston, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
top purchase ever
After certain use, the Vintage Style vintage Style Round Quartz Pocket Watch Women's Watches performs as expected so no complaints.​
3 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green
9 months ago ยท Los Angeles, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
truly impressed
Honestly, it feels okay and it works for me.
29 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท Albuquerque, NM
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
merely what I wanted
easy and effective Vintage Style timeless Style Round Quartz Pocket Watch Women's Watches.
8 people found this helpful

SL
Stephanie Lewis โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Las Vegas, NV
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
top decision
The Vintage Style enduring Style Round Quartz Pocket Watch Women's Watches arrived without any damage.
22 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 weeks ago ยท San Diego, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
purely what I wanted
After various use, it is practical which is good enough. Nothing fancy.
50 people found this helpful