🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 246+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage magazine rack and dust pan

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.4 out of 5 (246 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$6.5
$10.83
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Wrought iron magazine rack and metal dust pan. Offers accepted

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express fulfillment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage magazine rack and dust pan

Wrought iron magazine rack and metal dust pan.
Offers accepted

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1401379

Category: Vintage > Houseware > Other

Original Price: $10.83 USD

Sale Price:$6.5 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ on the house delivery on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.4
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5212 reviews
WG​
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy
Performance of the Vintage magazine rack and dust pan has been stable.​
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 weeks ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Couldn't be happier
In daily use, the Vintage magazine rack and dust pan works fine so it’s acceptable.
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Impressed!
Personally, the Vintage magazine rack and dust pan performs as expected and it’s fine overall.
13 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
So glad I bought this
Personally, the Vintage magazine rack and dust pan is straightforward to use so I’m okay with it.
10 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Totally worth it
The Vintage magazine rack and dust pan arrived exactly as described.
16 people found this helpful