๐Ÿšš no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.8/5 from 407+ reviews
Vintage โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

PINK Pajama Shorts

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.8 out of 5 (407 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$8.21
$13.68
Sale
โœ“ on the house dispatch on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Worn but favor recent, looks like a different color in the pictures, but they are mint

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
swift dispatch
โ†ฉ๏ธ
practical Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

PINK Pajama Shorts

Worn but prefer fresh, looks like a different color in the pictures, but they are mint​

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1420882

Category: Vintage > Houseware > Coasters

Original Price: $13.68 USD

Sale Price:$8.21 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

๐Ÿšš fulfillment & Returns

โœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.8
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 4852 reviews
JA
Joshua Allen โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago ยท Milwaukee, WI
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
magnificent value for money
To be fair, the PINK Pajama Shorts is practical so no complaints.​
38 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Cincinnati, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
superb PINK Pajama Shorts!
Quality feels fine for the price.
35 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Pittsburgh, PA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Five stars!
The PINK Pajama Shorts is straightforward to operate.
36 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท Atlanta, GA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
ideal PINK Pajama Shorts
Personally, the PINK Pajama Shorts works fine and it meets expectations. dispatch was normal.
32 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner
11 months ago ยท Cincinnati, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Outstanding!
At first, the PINK Pajama Shorts works well enough so itโ€™s acceptable.
13 people found this helpful