🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 163+ reviews
Women βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

SCOOP NECK TOP - Bustier

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.9 out of 5 (163 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$50
$83.33
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Fastening : No closurePattern : MarlArticle number : PO281A008-C11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy fulfillment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

SCOOP NECK TOP - Bustier

Fastening : No closure
Pattern : Marl
Article number : PO281A008-C11

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1625605

Category: Women > Clothing > Underwear

Original Price: $83.33 USD

Sale Price:$50 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days​

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 9610 reviews
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
top decision
In daily use, it feels okay and it works for me.
47 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Las Vegas, NV
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
A must-have
So far, the SCOOP NECK TOP - Bustier is hassle-at no charge to use and it’s fine overall. Nothing fancy.
35 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 days ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Simply extraordinary
From my experience, the SCOOP NECK TOP - Bustier works well enough and I don’t regret it.
42 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Tucson, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…​
No complaints
The SCOOP NECK TOP - Bustier is exactly what I needed.
48 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Baltimore, MD
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
So happy with this
After various use, the SCOOP NECK TOP - Bustier feels solid which is good enough.
32 people found this helpful