๐Ÿšš no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.1/5 from 610+ reviews
Women โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

NAOT Footwear Women's Alba Sandal

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.1 out of 5 (610 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$149.95
$249.92
Sale
โœ“ on the house dispatch on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Sole material: RubberClosure type: Hook & LoopRubber sole

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
express fulfillment
โ†ฉ๏ธ
straightforward Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

NAOT Footwear Women's Alba Sandal

  • Sole material: Rubber
  • Closure type: Hook & Loop
  • Rubber sole


This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Women products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1792573

Category: Women > SHOES > Sandals

Original Price: $249.92 USD

Sale Price: $149.95 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

๐Ÿšš dispatch & Returns

โœ“ on the house delivery on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.1
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 9110 reviews
WG
William Garcia โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Raleigh, NC
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
So happy with this
The NAOT Footwear Women's Alba Sandal feels premium for the price.
30 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 days ago ยท Seattle, WA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
fancy love love!
Nice quality and prompt fulfillment NAOT Footwear Women's Alba Sandal.
50 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท Tulsa, OK
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
appreciate it!
The NAOT Footwear Women's Alba Sandal works fine and arrived as expected.
27 people found this helpful​
BT
Brittany Turner โœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago ยท Phoenix, AZ
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…​
top purchase ever
it is practical so Iโ€™m okay with it. Arrived on time.
35 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Austin, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
superb value for money
In daily use, the NAOT Footwear Women's Alba Sandal works fine and it works for me.
42 people found this helpful