🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 449+ reviews
Toys ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller

Vintage 1962 Whitman Rummy Royal TABLE SIZE Plastic/Vinyl Game Sheet.

★★★★★ 4.6 out of 5 (449 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$19.99
$33.32
Sale
✓ on the house dispatch on this item • Limited time offer

Royal Rummy game mat with box. superb condition.

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy fulfillment

↩️
straightforward Returns

📋 Product Description

Vintage 1962 Whitman Rummy Royal TABLE SIZE Plastic/Vinyl Game Sheet.

Royal Rummy game mat with box. fabulous condition.

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 2073112

Category: Toys > Vintage & Antique Toys > Games

Original Price: $33.32 USD

Sale Price:$19.99 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 distribution & Returns

✓ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days​

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.6
★★★★★
Based on 5900 reviews
MR
Matthew Robinson ✓ Verified Purchase
7 months ago · Honolulu, HI
★★★★☆
Exceeded expectations
After various use, it works as described and it meets expectations.
22 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez ✓ Verified Purchase
7 months ago · San Diego, CA
★★★★☆
Outstanding quality
respectable product Vintage 1962 Whitman Rummy Royal TABLE SIZE Plastic/Vinyl Game Sheet..
32 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds ✓ Verified Purchase
4 months ago · Honolulu, HI
★★★★★
Outstanding!
At first, the Vintage 1962 Whitman Rummy Royal TABLE SIZE Plastic/Vinyl Game Sheet. works as described and I’m satisfied.
48 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis ✓ Verified Purchase
11 months ago · Kansas City, MO
★★★★★​
impeccable in every way
At first, the Vintage 1962 Whitman Rummy Royal TABLE SIZE Plastic/Vinyl Game Sheet. fits my needs and I’m satisfied.
16 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright ✓ Verified Purchase
1 month ago · Portland, OR
★★★★★
Absolutely ideal
So far, it performs as expected which feels reasonable.
34 people found this helpful