🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 439+ reviews
Toys βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

rubiks Cube vintage 1980s

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.3 out of 5 (439 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$3.57
$5.95
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Unsolved and an outstanding condition

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy fulfillment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

rubiks Cube vintage 1980s

Unsolved and an magnificent condition

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2085102

Category: Toys > Games & Puzzles > 3-D Puzzles

Original Price: $5.95 USD

Sale Price:$3.57 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days​

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4018 reviews
LN
Lauren Nelson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 weeks ago Β· Las Vegas, NV
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Outstanding quality
At first, the rubiks Cube vintage 1980s works as described which is good enough.
50 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding quality
After assorted use, the rubiks Cube vintage 1980s performs as expected so I’m okay with it.
11 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Louisville, KY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid rubiks Cube vintage 1980s
From my experience, the rubiks Cube vintage 1980s works as described so no complaints.
40 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…​
Fantastic product
After a few days, it feels okay and I don’t regret it.
34 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Jacksonville, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
outstanding for my needs
The rubiks Cube vintage 1980s works fine for me.
19 people found this helpful