🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 619+ reviews
Kids βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

RuffleButts Rainbow Gingham Shorts

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.2 out of 5 (619 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$9
$15
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

RuffleButts Rainbow Gingham Shorts. Size 2T. favor recent.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift dispatch
↩️
practical Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

RuffleButts Rainbow Gingham Shorts

RuffleButts Rainbow Gingham Shorts. Size 2T. prefer fresh.

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Kids products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2214678

Category: Kids > Girls Bottoms > Girls 2T-5T

Original Price: $15 USD

Sale Price:$9 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days​

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 9598 reviews
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
leading purchase ever
fine and reliable RuffleButts Rainbow Gingham Shorts.
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely cherish it
After several use, the RuffleButts Rainbow Gingham Shorts works well enough so I’m okay with it.
36 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall
6 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Really magnificent
splendid quality RuffleButts Rainbow Gingham Shorts, should last a long time. exceptionally satisfied customer here.
24 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous investment
Honestly, the RuffleButts Rainbow Gingham Shorts works fine so it’s acceptable.​
35 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Orlando, FL

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb choice
Honestly, the RuffleButts Rainbow Gingham Shorts works well enough and it’s fine overall.
6 people found this helpful